Socio-spatial groups or whom technical advisory practice serves
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22296/2317-1529.2018v20n2p221Keywords:
Technical advisory practices, Social group, Socio-spatial research, Autonomy, Production of spaceAbstract
The concept of socio-spatial groups proposed in this paper aims to provide a critical
reflection on technical advisory research and practices in architecture, urban design and urban planning. It
designates groups for whom space is constitutive, and who, conversely, constitute (produce) space. Its premise
is that technical advisory practices – as opposed to assistance – should strengthen group autonomy. The first
section explains the context of the discussion, and the difference between notions and (theoretical) concepts. The
second demonstrates why technical advisory practices have to overcome notions such as client, user, beneficiary
or community. The third explores sociological approaches to social groups, arguing that the concept of sociospatial groups is neither tautological nor merely incremental. The final section illustrates and summarizes
technical advisory approaches that work reflectively with socio-spatial groups, i. e. that possess a concept in
order to understand and to discuss whom they serve.
Downloads
References
ADORNO, Theodor. Negative Dialektik. Frankfurt/M: Suhrkamp, [1966] 1990.
ALBERTI, Leon Battista Alberti. On the Art of Building in Ten Books. Cambrigde, Massachussets: MIT Press, [1450] 1988.
BLACKSHAW, Tony. Key concepts in community studies. London: Sage, 2010.
BRANDÃO, Francisco de Assis da Silva. Curso de urbanismo do professor Gaston Bardet. Revista da Escola de Arquitetura da UMG, n.156, p. 156–160, (impresso) 1956.
BRASIL. Lei no 11.888, de 24 de dezembro de 2008. Assegura às famílias de baixa renda assistência técnica pública e gratuita para o projeto e a construção de habitação de interesse social e altera a Lei no 11.124, de 16 de junho de 2005. Diário Oficial da União, Seção 1, 26/12/2008, p. 2. Disponível em: http://www2. camara.leg.br/legin/fed/lei/2008/lei-11888-24-dezembro-2008-585074-norma-pl.html. Acesso em: 03/03/2018.
DURHAM, Eunice Ribeiro. A Dinâmica da Cultura: ensaios de antropologia. São Paulo: Cosacnaify, 2004.
EINSTEIN, Albert. Vorwort. In: JAMMER, Max. Das Problem des Raumes. Darmstadt, 1960.
EISENMAN, Peter. Notes on Conceptual Architecture: Towards a Definition. Design Quarterly, n.78/79, p. 1–5, 1970.
FILARETE (Antonio Pietro Averlino). Filarete's treatise on architecture. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1965.
FIRTH, Raymond. We, The Tikopia. A sociological study of kinship in primitive Polynesia. London: Allen & Unwin, 1936.
FIRTH, Raymond. Primitive Polynesian Economy. London: Routledge, 1939.
FIRTH, Raymond. The Work of the Gods in Tikopia. Melbourne: Melbourne University Press, 1940.
FOOTE WHITE, William. Street Corner Society: The social structure of an Italian Slum.
Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1943.
HATCH, D. L. Changes in the Structure and Function of a Rural New England Community since 1900. Harvard University, 1948 (Tese de Doutorado).
HALBWACHS, Maurice. Morphologie Sociale. Paris: Armand Colin, 1938.
HARVEY, David. Space as a Key Word. Paper for Marx and Philosophy Conference, Institute of Education, London, 2004. Disponível em: http://www.frontdeskapparatus. com/files/harvey2004.pdf. Acesso em: 03/03/2018.
HARVEY, David. The right to the city. New Left Review, n.53, p. 23–40, 2008. Disponível em: https://newleftreview.org/II/53/david-harvey-the-right-to-the-city. Acesso em: 03/03/2018.
HOMANS, George C. The Human Group. New Brunswick; London: Transactions, [1951] 2004.
HORKHEIMER, Max. Teoria tradicional e teoria crítica [1937]. In: HORKHEIMER, Max; ADORNO, Theodor. Textos Escolhidos. São Paulo: Nova Cultural, 1989.
ILLICH, Ivan. Needs. Manuscrito inédito. Bremen, 1990.
JAISSON, M. Temps et espace chez Maurice Halbwachs. Revue d’Histoire des Sciences Humaines, n.1, p. 163–178, (impresso) 1999.
JAMESON, Fredric. Postmodernism or The Cultural Logic of Late Capitalism. London: Verso, 1991.
KAPP, Silke. Direito ao espaço cotidiano: moradia e autonomia no plano de uma metrópole. Cadernos Metrópole (PUCSP), v. 14, p. 463–485, 2012. Disponível em: http://cadernosmetropole.net/system/artigos/arquivos/000/000/243/original/cm28_244.pdf?1474650655. Acesso em: 03/03/2018.
KIRCH, Patrick V. Microcosmic Histories. Island Perspectives on ‘Global’ Change. American Anthropologist, v. 99, n. 1, p. 30–42, (impresso) 1997.
LE CAMUS DE MÉZIÈRES, Nicolas. Le guide de ceux qui veulent bâtir. Paris: B. Morin, 1781.
LEVEBRE, Henri. O direito à cidade. São Paulo: Centauro, [1968] 2001.
LEFEBVRE, Henri. From the social pact to the contract of citizenship [1990]. In: ELDEN, S.; LEBAS, E.; KPFMAN, E. (Eds.). Henri Lefebvre – Key writings. London/New York: Continuum, 2003.
LÖW, Martina. Raumsoziologie. Frankfurt/M: Suhrkamp, [2001] 2012.
MACIEL, Carlos Alberto. Arquitetura, projeto e conceito. Arquitextos, São Paulo, v.4, n.043.10, Vitruvius, s.p., dez. 2003. Disponível em: http://www.vitruvius.com.br /revistas/ read/arquitextos/04.043/633. Acesso em: 03/03/2018.
MAYO, Elton. The Human Problems of an Industrial Civilization. New York: Macmillan,1933.
MERTON, Robert. The Focussed Interview and Focus Groups: Continuities and Discontinuities. The Public Opinion Quarterly, v. 51, n. 4, p. 550–566, (impresso) 1987.
NAHOUM, Benjamin (ed.). Una historia con quince mil protagonistas: Las cooperativas de vivienda por ayua mutua uruguayas. Montevideo: Intendencia Municipal de Montevideo y Junta de Andalucía, [1999] 2008.
PARSONS, David J. “A indústria da construção”. In: SNYDER James C.; CATANESE, Anthony J. (Eds.) Introdução à Arquitetura. Tradução de Heloisa Frederico. Rio de Janeiro: Campus, [1979] 1984, p. 92–112.
PICON, Antoine. Introduction. In: DURAND, Jean-Nicolas-Louis. Précis of the Lectures on Architecture: With Graphic Portion of the Lectures on Architecture. Los Angeles: Getty Research Institute, 2000.
POGREBINSCHI, Thamy. O Enigma do Político. Marx contra a política moderna. Rio de Janeiro: Civilização Brasileira, 2009.
RÉMY, Jean. Trends in Urban Sociology in French speaking countries from 1945 to 1980. Geojournal, v. 31, n. 3, p. 265–278, 1993. Disponível em: http://www.jstor.org/ stable/ 41146010. Acesso em: 03/03/2018.
SCHÄFERS, B. (ed.): Einführung in die Gruppensoziologie. Geschichte – Theorien – Analysen. Wiesbaden: Quelle & Mayer, 1999.
SNYDER James C.; CATANESE, Anthony J. (Eds.) Introdução à Arquitetura. Tradução de Heloisa Frederico. Rio de Janeiro: Campus, [1979] 1984.
STANEK, Lukasz. Henry Lefebvre on Space. Architecture, Urban Research and the Production of Theory. Mineapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2011.
STEVENS, Garry. The favored circle: the social foundations of architectural distinction.
Cambridge, Massachussets: MIT Press, 2002.
SOJA, Edward W. Postmodern Geographies: The Reassertion of Space in Critical Social Theory. London: Verso, 1989.
SOUZA, Marcelo Lopes de. Os conceitos fundamentais da pesquisa sócio-espacial. Rio de Janeiro: Bertrand Brasil, 2013.
TÖNNIES, Ferdinand. Gemeinschaft und Gesellschaft. Grundbegriffe der reinen Soziologie. Berlin: Karl Curtius, [1887] 1922.
VALLADARES, Lícia do Prado. A Invenção da Favela. Do mito de origem à favela.com. Rio de Janeiro: Fuundação Getúlio Vargas, 2005.
WEBER, Max. Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft. Tübingen: J. C. B. Mohr, 1922.
WILLIS, Paul. Learning to Labour: How Working Class Kids Get Working Class Jobs. New York: Columbia University Press, [1977] 1981.
ZIMMERMAN, C. C. The Changing Community. New York; London: Harper, 1938.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2018 Revista Brasileira de Estudos Urbanos e Regionais
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms:
1) Authors who publish in RBEUR retain the rights to their work and assign to the journal the right to first publication, performed under the Creative Commons Attribution License that allows work to be shared and assures the recognition of authorship and of the original publication vehicle, to RBEUR.
2) Authors are free to assume additional contracts separately, for publication and non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this journal (e.g., publishing in an institutional repository or as a book chapter), reaffirming the authorship and recognition of the original publication vehicle, to RBEUR.
.png)
