Between Compensation and Silence: Environmental Necropolitics in the Legal Settlement for Full Reparation of the Mariana Disaster
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22296/2317-1529.rbeur.202607ptKeywords:
Political Ecology, Environmental Justice, Territory and Territorialities, Mariana Disaster, Doce River BasinAbstract
This article offers a critical analysis of the 2024 Full and Definitive Legal Reparation Settlement, signed following the failure of the Fundão tailings dam. It argues that the settlement institutionalizes a form of environmental necropolitics by converting the Mariana (MG) disaster-crime into a matter of technical management and financial compensation. Rather than delivering substantive justice, the legal framework suppresses the ongoing suffering and territorial claims of the affected communities. Grounded in political ecology and critical legal studies, the research focuses on clauses concerning broad discharge, waiver of appeal and procedural closure, interpreted as legal mechanisms for silencing the affected communities. Focusing on the Doce River Basin – particularly in Bento Rodrigues and Paracatu de Baixo – the study highlights how this model reinforces the coloniality of power by erasing local knowledge and lifestyles in favor of legal predictability. It concludes that the agreed-upon reparation fosters economic pacification rather than ecological, cultural and communal reconstruction.
Downloads
References
ACOSTA, A. El buen vivir: Sumak Kawsay, una oportunidad para imaginar otros mundos. Barcelona: Icaria Editorial, 2016.
ADGER, W. N. Social Capital, Collective Action, and Adaptation to Climate Change. Economic Geography, v. 79, n. 4, p. 387-404, 2003.
AGAMBEN, G. Estado de exceção. São Paulo: Boitempo, 2004.
AGAMBEN, G. Homo sacer: o poder soberano e a vida nua I. Belo Horizonte, Editora UFMG, 2010.
ALTIERI, M. A.; TOLEDO, V. M. The Agroecological Revolution in Latin America: Rescuing Nature, Ensuring Food Sovereignty and Empowering Peasants. Journal of Peasant Studies, v. 38, n. 3, p. 587-612, 2011.
AUYERO, J. Pacientes del Estado. Buenos Aires: Eudeba, 2016.
AVILA, S. Environmental Justice and the Expanding Geography of Wind Power Conflicts. Sustainability Science, v. 13, p. 599-616, 2018.
BERKES, F. Rethinking Community-Based Conservation. Conservation Biology, v. 18, n. 3, p. 621-30, 2004.
BIERMANN, F. et al. Navigating the Anthropocene: Improving Earth System Governance. Science, v. 335, p. 1306-7, 2012.
BOURDIEU, P. Marginalia: algumas notas adicionais sobre o dom. Mana, v. 2, n. 2, p. 7-20, 1996.
BRASIL. Acordo Judicial para Reparação Integral e Definitiva Relativa ao Rompimento da Barragem de Fundão. Tribunal Regional Federal da 6ª Região, Belo Horizonte, 25 out. 2024.
CLAPP, J.; DAUVERGNE, P. Paths to a Green World: The Political Economy of the Global Environment. Cambridge: MIT Press, 2011.
ESCOBAR, A. Designs for the Pluriverse: Radical Interdependence, Autonomy, and the Making of Worlds. Durham: Duke University Press, 2018.
FALKNER, R. The Paris Agreement and the New Logic of International Climate Politics. International Affairs, v. 92, n. 5, p. 1107-25, 2016.
FEDERICI, S. Reenchanting the World: Feminism and the Politics of the Commons. Oakland: PM Press, 2012.
FOLKE, C. et al. Adaptive Governance of Social-Ecological Systems. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, v. 30, p. 441-73, 2005.
FOSTER, J. B.; CLARK, B. The Robbery of Nature: Capitalism and the Ecological Rift. New York: Monthly Review Press, 2020.
GARNETT, S. T. et al. A Spatial Overview of the Global Importance of Indigenous Lands for Conservation. Nature Sustainability, v. 1, p. 369-74, 2018.
GRAEBER, D. Debt: The First 5,000 Years. Brooklyn: Melville House, 2011.
HARDT, M.; NEGRI, A. Empire. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2000.
HARVEY, D. Rebel Cities: From the Right to the City to the Urban Revolution. London: Verso, 2012.
HICKEL, J. Less Is More: How Degrowth Will Save the World. London: Penguin Random House, 2021.
HORNBERG, A. Nature, Society, and Justice in the Anthropocene: Unraveling the Money-Energy-Technology Complex. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2019.
MARTÍNEZ-ALIER, J. The Environmentalism of the Poor: A Study of Ecological Conflicts and Valuation. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2002.
MBEMBE, A. Necropolítica. São Paulo: N-1 Edições, 2018.
MOLINA, M. G. de; TOLEDO, V. M. The Social Metabolism: A Socio-Ecological Theory of Historical Change. Cham: Springer, 2014.
MOORE, J. W. Capitalism in the Web of Life: Ecology and the Accumulation of Capital. London: Verso Books, 2015.
OSTROM, E. A General Framework for Analyzing Sustainability of Social-Ecological Systems. Science, v. 325, p. 419-22, 2009.
PIMBERT, M. Food Sovereignty, Agroecology and Biocultural Diversity: Constructing and Contesting Knowledge. London: Routledge, 2018.
PORTO-GONÇALVES, C. W. A globalização da natureza e a natureza da globalização. 4. ed. Rio de Janeiro: Civilização Brasileira, 2006.
SALLEH, A. Eco-Sufficiency and Global Justice: Women Write Political Ecology. London: Pluto Press, 2017.
SANÍN-RESTREPO, R.; ARAÚJO, M. M. A teoria da encriptação do poder: itinerário de uma ideia. Revista da Faculdade Mineira de Direito, v. 23, p. 1-17, 2020.
SCOTT, J. C. Seeing Like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1998.
SVAMPA, M. El colapso ecológico ya llegó: una brújula para salir del (mal)desarrollo. Buenos Aires: Siglo XXI Editores, 2019.
TEIXEIRA, R. O. S.; LIMA, M. M. de. A política do tempo no desastre: disputas pela reparação no reassentamento da comunidade de Paracatu de Baixo. Revista Brasileira de Estudos Urbanos e Regionais, v. 24, e202201pt, 2022.
WRIGHT, E. O. Envisioning Real Utopias. London: Verso Books, 2010.
ZHOURI, A. et al. The Rio Doce Mining Disaster in Brazil: Between Policies of Reparation and the Politics of Affectations. Vibrant, v. 14, p. 81-101, 2017.
ZUCARELLI, M. C. A matemática da gestão e a alma lameada: os conflitos da governança no licenciamento do projeto de mineração Minas-Rio e no desastre da Samarco. 2018. 372 f. Tese (Doutorado em Sociologia) – Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, 2018.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Categories
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms:
1) Authors who publish in RBEUR retain the rights to their work and assign to the journal the right to first publication, performed under the Creative Commons Attribution License that allows work to be shared and assures the recognition of authorship and of the original publication vehicle, to RBEUR.
2) Authors are free to assume additional contracts separately, for publication and non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this journal (e.g., publishing in an institutional repository or as a book chapter), reaffirming the authorship and recognition of the original publication vehicle, to RBEUR.
.png)
